Elzbieta Matynia is a historian of ideas and a sociologist of culture, with special interests in performance both in theater and beyond.  She has written incisively about the making of democracy and works actively in the support of free intellectual exchange.

She, the director of the Transregional Center for Democratic Studies of the New School, is currently a Fulbright research  scholar in Johannesburg, South Africa. We at the Center saw her off at our annual beginning of the year party, as I reported in a previous post.  I asked her to periodically send us reports as she researches the tragedy of the assassination of Chris Hani, a former head of the South African Communist Party (aligned with the African National Congress) and a widely admired anti-apartheid leader seen as a potential successor to Nelson Mandela. I have just received her first impressions.

Elzbieta and I first met in her native Poland when I was studying theater, an artistic form that created cultural and social alternatives in a repressive state. It’s strange to receive her note. Now she is in the position I once was, an outsider trying to make sense of a difficult political situation.  Her most recent book, Performative Democracy, is in dialogue with my most recent, The Politics of Small Things.  She starts, appropriately, as Tocqueville or Montesquieu would, by setting the stage with a description of the physical environment, linking it to the hopes and fears of a country undergoing significant political challenges. – Jeff

Do you want to experience the most spectacular spring ever?  Come to Johannesburg in late September: you can smell it, you can see it, and you can almost hear it. The African jasmine is in bloom, the fragrance of its star-like flowers fills every street. You can see the buds of camellias in the parks, and hear people talking about the purple-blue flowers of the big jacaranda trees that are about to provide this vigorous city with a brief but tranquil blue tapestry.

At the same time one senses a nostalgia for the recent winter that brought an even greater joy to this city and to this country, with the remarkable spirit of unity that blossomed during the World Cup, when the city and the country across racial and class divides reveled in being the center of the soccer world, proud of being a world class host for a global media event.

But now the political scene is getting increasingly bitter, and for many, worrisome. It is not easy for a visitor to make sense of it, but last week’s Durban conference of the African National Congress, the 98-year-old liberation movement and ruling party, forced some issues to the surface, brought them into sharper focus, made them for the moment at least, less confusing.

Julius Malema visits Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe

Although the conference allowed the media only limited access to its proceedings, it became clear that over the 16 years since the dismantling of apartheid, its leading actor, the ANC, faces a startling challenge from its own children, the ANC Youth League. Its controversial leader, Julius Malema, who was only twelve when the negotiated settlement with the apartheid regime was reached, is now the most divisive figure in the party. Though he never went to college, his skillful use of both irreverent and vitriolic language (recently directed against the ANC and its allies), and his dubious activities (a trip to Zimbabwe last March to lend support to Robert Mugabe’s policies) made him a popular public figure for some, and a dangerous demagogue for others. There is no doubt that his rebellious, populist performance (demanding legislation for the state to expropriate private property on behalf of the people), though still formally within the ANC framework, contributes greatly to the fragmentation of the party. He himself, flamboyantly arrogant, demands a radical transformation of the ANC, with a greater presence of the younger generation in its leadership.  Observing him one wonders how a high-school dropout could have arrived at such a powerful position. What makes people listen to him? President Jacob Zuma, who is also known for his populist rhetoric, presented himself at the Durban conference as a responsible leader and statesman. In fact many commentators talk about it as a struggle between the “juniors” and the “seniors”.

Though disciplined harshly by Zuma at the conference, Malema and his “young guns” managed to put on the agenda — uninvited and unwelcomed by the ANC elders – a push for the nationalization of mines.  At the moment Zuma seems to be still in charge of the situation, as everybody took note of his “have had enough” remark  and his closing words at the conference on Friday (9/24): Anyone who crosses the line in the ANC will “face the consequences”.

For a sympathetic outsider who is trying to make sense of it all, these are worrisome developments, and not only because they confirm the feeling that there seems to be a good climate in various parts of the world — from Global North to Global South — for effective demagoguery, the appeal to emotions and prejudices. What worries me is that here in South Africa they are combined with fairly advanced demands to establish control over the media, whose freedom has been seen as part of the problem. In fact a large part of the Durban conference was devoted to a discussion on setting up a special statutory body to hold media accountable for their reporting. And a majority of the delegates enthusiastically supported it.

For a sympathetic outsider who has herself lived in a system that presented itself as democratic centralism, the demands for party discipline are worrisome, even if they are meant to rein in political lunatics like Malema.  Today at breakfast a friend told me about the Zulu concept of hlonipha that is deeply ingrained in South African culture.  It denotes respect, especially respect for the elders to ensure dignity and stability at home. Young people should not criticize their elders, no matter how many wives they have or how many lucrative positions they hold. And they should not criticize the Party.

As somebody who cares about the ways in which local cultural paradigms and local knowledge are taken into account and engaged in strengthening and legitimizing political practices in new democracies, I do worry. I worry that the culturally embedded ethos of hlonipha may exclude debate, dialogue, and a free media, while supporting the newer, imported, and deeply anti-democratic  principle of democratic centralism and media censorship announced in Zuma’s introduction of  “revolutionary discipline”.

This Tuesday, we went a step further.  I introduced the project to some dear friends and colleagues at the annual opening party of the New School’s Transregional Center for Democratic Studies.   The party was a pleasure, as it always is.  I was especially pleased by the response to my developing blog, and the prospect that this will be the beginning of a beautiful relationship between TCDS and DC, a variation on an old theme.

TCDS and Me

The story of TCDS and my story are intimately connected.  It’s an example of the politics of small things, in which I am one of the central actors.  There is a long version and a short version.  I’ll start the long by highlighting the short with some quick headlines, and hope that we can continue the story’s themes in this new setting.

Elzbieta Matynia (who is the TCDS director) and I each worked on the sociology of theater in Poland, meeting there.   More details about this time later, for now just note that a deep friendship between Elzbieta and my wife, Naomi, and me developed and has endured, through major international and personal crises, martial law in Poland, changes in our social and political circumstances.  We developed parallel careers which met at the New School.  When martial law was declared in Poland in 1981, Elzbieta’s one-year scholarship to study at our university became a lifetime relationship: first as a visiting scholar, then as an adjunct instructor, now as the Director of the Transregional Center and senior member of our Department of Sociology and Committee on Liberal Studies.

The seeds of TCDS were planted when she and I met in Poland.  It was firmly rooted in the mid 80s, when, with her help, I established an unofficial, and in Central Europe clandestine, Democracy Seminar, chaired by Adam Michnik in Warsaw, and Gyorgy Bence in Budapest and me in New York. Vaclav Havel was to chair a section in Prague, but political conditions made this impossible.

In 1989, the clandestine met the open air and bloomed, and the small seminar that I chaired expanded beyond the three countries and beyond my administrative competence and imagination, and became first the East Central Europe Program, directed by Elzbieta.  Later, as our scope broadened to include South Africa, and most of the new states emerging from the former Soviet Union, including the Republics of Central Asia, the Transregional Center for Democratic Studies was instituted and flourished due to her passionate and visionary leadership.

Chris Hani, left, with Nelson Mandela

All sorts of scholarly exchanges, incredible summer institutes in Krakow and now Wroclaw, Poland, in Cape Town and soon to be Johannesburg, South Africa; seminars, lectures, films, performances and conferences were developed, presented and flourished.  Tuesday, we were opening this year’s activities, but there was an unusual strained, though hopeful, note.  Elzbieta was off to South Africa the next day, as a Fulbright Research Fellow to conduct a study of the difficult case of the assassination of Chris Hani by the exiled, anti-communist Pole, Janusz Waluś, an assassination that almost derailed the peaceful dismantling of the Apartheid regime.  She hopes her study will include interviews with the incarcerated assassin.  How could someone who was associated with a liberation movement kill a hero of a similar movement?

As we wished her good bye and good luck, students and faculty who were returning from this year’s Institute in Wroclaw caught up with each, as did veterans of the Institutes past and other TCDS activities.  Ann Snitow, the co-editor of  the important, Feminist Memoir Project and author of the brilliant “A Gender Diary,” and the leading force behind the Network of East West Women, gave a quick and unfortunately dark account of how the commemoration of the Gdansk agreements went.  The commemoration of the great achievement of independent workers and their supporters against the Communist regime, she sadly reported, made little sense, was confused and poorly organized.  Ann, my beloved interlocutor in many past Institutes in Krakow, settled in conclusion on a colorful Yiddish term meaning all mixed up and without meaning, kitschy, overly ornate, “ungapotchka,” to summarize the event.

And I introduced DC, on a more hopeful note, inviting everyone to take a look and think of how they might add their voices, their insights, their deliberate considerations about the pressing issues of the day with meaning and to the point.  I was pleased by the excitement and anticipate that my many friends and colleagues who were at the New York party will join us, but also that the great number of TCDS alumni and participants from around the world will join in.

I look forward to hearing from you and hope that we can continue to discuss together serious problems, as we have done in Poland and South Africa, and in the many countries of East and Central Europe, and in New York.  Please do make a comment, ask a question, or just say hello.  I hope this venue will help us to continue the ongoing discussions that for me started so many years ago in Poland, and are now centered in New York, but can become active here.  I await Elzbieta’s first report about how things are going on her new adventure.   And I will further explain in future posts what I have done at TCDS and earlier in the Democracy Seminar, as it informs what I hope we will do at DC.