Would it be DeliberatelyConsidered.org or DeliberatelyConsidered.com, non-commercial or commercial?  I chose the commercial route in the hopes that the blog would be self-sustaining and self-defining as much as possible from the start, and if it grew, if I needed more support in providing a space for serious reflections and exchanges about pressing issues of the day, it wouldn’t cost me and I wouldn’t need to raise funds.

For many people, this decision would be straightforward.  For those who are sure that capitalism is the root of all evil, who imagine a systemic alternative to capitalism, in socialism, it’s clear, “.org” is clearly the way to go.  For those who see the free market as the answer to all problems, the decision is equally clear.  But I am more ambivalent, less sure than such true believers, as I wrote about in an earlier post.

In going commercial, I had in mind an observation Russell Jacoby made in his book, The Last Intellectuals. He mourned the substitution of academic life for the culture of urbane intellectuals, the culture of university cafeterias for café culture, academic journals for the small magazines that sustained such intellectuals as Edmund Wilson, Irving Howe, Mary McCarthy and others like them.

Jacoby celebrated a world in which people actually could make a living from critical writing.  They had a freedom and independence that supported a style of intellectual life that appears to be a thing of the past, a lost golden age as Jacoby sees it.

While I am not so nostalgic, I thought that a commercial blog may provide a space for a revival of the sort of critical culture he and I admire.  I would create a space for critical reflection that was not dependent on academic priorities but upon public concerns, of everyday, in the Kitchen Table, of interdisciplinary scholarly concern, in the Scholars’ Lounge, of general intellectual and public concern, at Joe’s Café, and in the emerging but not completely formed world of global public discussion, in Global Perspectives.  The spontaneity and flexibility of the market and the standards of academic review, in established ways:  both have their advantages.

DC is an experiment in reviving a kind of critical culture.  Perhaps it was never lost, but it needs new platforms.