Today we post the controversial Rabbinical open letter in Israel prohibiting as a matter of religious obligation the renting or selling of property to non-Jews, translated and with reflections on its meaning by Iddo Tavory. It has caused great controversy in Israel and beyond (link and link), including at DC as it challenges the meaning of Israel as a democratic and Jewish state. -Jeff
The Translation:
In response to the query of many, we respond that is forbidden, by Torah-law, to sell a house or a field in the land of Israel to a non-Jew. As Maimonedes wrote: “as it is written (Deuteronomy 7:2) ‘thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them’ which means you shall give them no title to land. For if you do not give them title, their staying shall be temporary.” (laws: 77; 10, 4). And on that topic, the Torah warned in numerous places, that it causes evil and make the many sin in intermarriage, as it is said “For they will turn your sons away from following Me” (Deuteronomy 7:4), which is blasphemy (Maimonedes, 12:6). And it also causes the many to otherwise transgress, as the Torah has warned: “They shall not live in your land, because they will make you sin against Me” (Exodus 23: 33). And the sin of he who sells, and he who profits from it, is upon the heads of those who sell, God shall have mercy.
And evil upon evil, that he who sells or lets them rent an apartment in an area in which Jews are living, causes great damage to his neighbors, and for them it is said “and they shall trouble you in the land where you dwell.” (Numbers 33: 55). For their way of life is different from that of Jews, and some of them harass us and make our life hard, to the point of danger to our very lives, as has become well known on several occasions. And even outside of Israel they have forbidden to sell them in Jewish neighborhoods for this very reason, and all the more so in the land of Israel, as it is elucidated in the [Jewish book of law] Shulhan Aruch (Yoreh Deah, 151) that it is a prohibition that pertains both to the realm of actions between man and God and that between man and his fellow man.
And it is well known that renting or selling even one apartment causes all of the neighbors’ apartments’ prices to go down, even when initially the renters or buyers seem nice. And he who rents or sells first thus causes his neighbors great loss, and his sin is too great to bear. And who let him do such a thing? And he causes others to sell their property after him, to take flight from the place. And those who follow him in selling to non-Jews, they compound the grave sin that is the responsibility of all.
And if this foreigner is violent and harasses his neighbors, then it was already elucidated in the Shulhan Aruch that all who sell to him should be excommunicated!! And that until the seller undoes this evil, even if that costs him much money. (Yoreh Deah 344: 43). And in our days, as it is well known, we do not excommunicate, as excommunication is of grave consequence. However, his neighbors must talk to him and warn him, first in private, and if that doesn’t work, they are then allowed to make his name public. And to stay away from him socially, and to avoid having any business relations with him, and not to give him any honors in reading the Torah in synagogue, and other such measures. And that until he changes his decision on this issue that causes great harm to the many. And those who listen to us shall dwell in peace. Amen, may it be God’s will.
Reflections
You may ask why it is important to know exactly what the rabbis wrote. We know the gist of it already. However, there are a couple of things that I think could be noted if you actually do pay attention to it:
The letter begins in ordinary rabbinic fashion, with quotes from the Bible and from Maimonedes (and later from the “Shulhan Aruch,” which is a compilation of laws based on major interpretations of the Talmud). As many have opined based on this, the fact that these rabbis decreed that it is “prohibited” to sell to a non-Jew is not that surprising. There are plenty of sources they could use. Indeed, there was actually a short letter written a few years ago, that somehow did not make it to the news, that said basically the same, signed by 5-6 major rabbis. This does not make it less racist of course.
But now note the third paragraph. Here, suddenly, the rhetoric slightly changes to talk about real-estate prices, and the dangers of Jewish-flight (seems like this could be written by any white supremacist, just change “non-Jew” to Black, and “Jew” to White). Interesting that the rabbis’ letter so seamlessly articulate the presumably religious with the patently racist.
Last, and perhaps most troubling, the rabbis note that though official excommunication does not exist anymore in the Orthodox world, they recommend that people basically cut all social ties with those who sell or rent to Arabs. This, from people who receive their salary from the state (though not hired directly by the state, but through the rabbinate).
There are other things in the letter that deserve attention, but I leave the readers with the following: a week after the publication of this letter the following text appeared on posters all over Bat-Yam, a city adjacent to Tel-Aviv:
I would like to add a reflection to the reflection and join in the
fear of what President Peres called a moral crisis and I see as diminishing moral standards, on which Netanyahu himself reflected in the newly established Bible contest for adults on December 7: “how would we feel if people said not to rent or sell apartments to Jews”? precisely this leap to seeing Jews as victims in Palestine before 1948 or more directly, in Europe of the 1930’s and 40’s make it easy to keep treating Palestinians as others in the Isralei discourse. Today, a gang of young Jerusalem and Settelment residents were arrested in suspicion that they attacked Palestinians in Jerusalem: http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/teen-gang-arrested-on-suspicion-of-attacking-arabs-in-jerusalem-1.331826. This has been the case in the territories and other cities in Israel for a while, and is escalating now.
There is definitely a difference between the first half and second half of the letter. The second half seems totally unacceptable, since it puts economic gain over the dignity of human beings. However, the first half seems purely biblical. I am not a religious person, but I do value integrity. The American culture I was born into strongly promoted multiculturalism. In school we were taught to respect everyone’s beliefs, to live and let live. I see the pragmatic value of this, but the relativism seems problematic to me. The only way I see multiculturalism functioning is by the participants ignoring those parts of their beliefs that conflict with their living in a multicultural society. If I put myself in the shoes of a Christian, God and salvation are of ultimate importance. If I truly believe this then I am put in quite a situation seeing that so many around me are sinning and are on the path to hell. Moreover, if I have children, I would surely want them to be saved, so it would be very important to keep away any significant influences that might damn my children to hell. So getting back into my own shoes, I wonder why Christians are not out tirelessly trying to save the souls of non-believers. Wouldn’t they be obligated to do so? And how can they possibly stand living in a society filled with such lust and materialism. How could a true Christian accept such a society? Only through the repression of fundamental conflicts.
I would actually rather live in a society where people expressed their religious beliefs completely. I’d like to see the hard choices being made rather than the continuation of the repression. This does not mean that holy war would follow, for religions tend to advocate love and compassion above all else. Furthermore, hard choices require hard thinking, which would most likely carry over into the non-religious realms of people’s lives, such as the realm of politics. This might then lead to the development of a political culture where deliberate consideration is the norm rather than the exception.
Alt Tags…
[…]we like to honor other sites on the web, even if they aren’t related to us, by linking to them. Below are some sites worth checking out[…]…